.

Supervisors Endorse Proposition 30

Proposition 30 is Gov. Jerry Brown's initiative that calls for a quarter-cent increase in sales tax to provide funding for schools.

In a 3-2 vote, the Board of Supervisors on Tuesday formally endorsed Proposition 30, a Nov. 6 ballot measure that would raise income tax on those making more than $250,000 annually and increase sales taxes by one-quarter of one cent.

"Voting no on Proposition 30 is playing with fire for the state of California," said Supervisor Zev Yaroslavsky, who, along with Supervisor Gloria Molina, recommended the endorsement.

Supervisor Mark Ridley-Thomas also supported the endorsement, while Supervisors Don Knabe and Michael Antonovich dissented.

In an email to constituents, Knabe, who represents the Palos Verdes Peninsula in his fourth district, said, "While Proposition 30 does include the constitutional amendment I have been fighting for to guarantee funding for programs the state has dumped on counties, this is simply a temporary solution to a stagnant and systemic problem in Sacramento."

Knabe also called the proposition "a lazy effort to place the burden of the state's budget deficit on the tax-payer instead of on our elected-leaders to find a suitable solution to our state's fiscal crisis.

"Proposition 30 doesn't guarantee any new funding for schools and includes no reform to prevent a similar situation down the road."

The state's legislative analyst estimates the proposition would raise as much as $6 billion annually over the next four years, 89 percent of which would go to K-12 schools and 11 percent to community colleges, according to the language of the ballot measure. If not passed, $6 billion in service cuts—resulting in a decrease $457 per student funding in Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District—would be needed to balance the state budget.

Antonovich argued that the state's already high sales tax was driving businesses out.

"We have one of the highest sales tax in the United States," Antonovich said, "and as a result of that, we've had a major loss of jobs."

The measure would increase income taxes on annual earnings over $250,000 for seven years and increase sales taxes by one-quarter of one cent for four years.

It would also guarantee funding for public safety realignment, which has shifted responsibility for monitoring parolees and jailing low-level offenders from the state to county governments.

"Without it, we're in trouble," Molina said of the guarantee.

In an interview with Los Angeles Times columnist Steve Lopez, Palos Verdes Peninsula Board of Education member Vanden Bos said he had decided to support both Proposition 30 and Proposition 38. The latter, which would raise income taxes on almost all Californians, was proposed by attorney Molly Munger.

If both measures pass, the one with the most votes will take effect.

If neither passes, "we're talking about going off the cliff, not just in our district, but every district in California," Bos told Lopez. At risk could be athletics funding and music and arts programs. Local elementary schools may share principals, Lopez wrote in his article.

Prior budget cuts forced the elimination of 60 percent of athletic funding, library aids, tech aids and a Chinese-language program, among others. The district only has one librarian for the 17 schools, and some janitorial positions have also been eliminated.

—City News Service contributed to this report.

Nicole Mooradian (Editor) October 10, 2012 at 04:05 AM
There was a glitch on the page and a comment from Peter Michel was deleted. Here is the text of his comment: "None of the monies will go towards education. Read the fine print."
Nicole Mooradian (Editor) October 10, 2012 at 04:15 AM
And now here is my reply to Peter: According to the Attorney General's summary of the proposition, all the money goes toward helping local agencies with realignment in addition to education. Money earmarked for education (89 percent for K-12 and 11 percent for college) will be put in its own account in the General Fund, according to initiative text. All money in that Education Protection Account must go to school districts, county offices of education, charter schools and community college districts. You can read the text of the initiative here: http://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php/Text_of_California_Proposition_30_%28November_2012%29 (There's a link at the bottom of the wiki page to a .pdf with the full text of all initiatives on the secretary of state's site, if you want to confirm.)
IAM October 10, 2012 at 06:00 PM
California needs to cuts wasted spending not increase taxes. This is like a business person increasing their product prices in the face of declining sales, finding that sales continue to decline, deciding to increase prices again. There must come a time when government agrees to spend what it takes in, not take in what it can spend!

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »