Cyclists Gain More Access to Palos Verdes Nature Preserve

The Rancho Palos Verdes City Council's decision designates more trails for bicycle use.

This article was originally published at 11:56 p.m. Tuesday. It was updated at 10:45 a.m. Wednesday with a full recap of Tuesday's meeting.

The Rancho Palos Verdes City Council unanimously approved the majority of a staff recommendation Tuesday that will open up additional trails in the Palos Verdes Nature Preserve to cyclists.

With Tuesday's vote, mountain bikers will now have access to 15 additional trails across the multiple nature reserves contained within the Palos Verdes Nature Preserve. Previously, those trails had either not been designated or were limited to equestrians and pedestrians only.

Proponents for both sides of the issue filled the council chambers for a meeting that lasted more than five hours. In all, close to 40 speakers addressed the city council to argue their point.

Opponents to the plan included equestrians, hikers and advocates for limiting recreation in the preserve. They argued that cyclists often spook horses, cause safety issues on narrow trails and lead to environmental degradation by riding off trail and creating their own spur trails.

"Speed and extreme challenges are the goal for this sport," Barbara Ailor said of mountain biking. "To say a trail is multi use is really, sadly incorrect... Nobody can enjoy a multiuse trail that resembles the X-Games."

Audience members applauded.

Nancy Wildman, an equestrian, also took issue with the speed aspect of downhill mountain biking. "I just don't feel like I should have my safety put at risk because people want to come speeding down the hill," Wildman said. "I don't have anything against bicyclists, it's the speed that causes the issue."

Another resident questioned whether allowing mountain biking in the preserve lives up the the conservancy's mission of providing quiet and peaceful solitude in nature.

"I am very devastated by what has been happening to our nature preserve, which is not primarily a recreation area," she said. "It is for passive recreation, if any."

Cyclists at the meeting argued that the actions of a few bad apples should not represent the cycling community as a whole and that the majority of interactions between user groups are friendly and cordial.

"I would urge to you disregard all the doom and gloom you have been hearing... One incident five years ago is trying to be portrayed as an everyday incident," said Mark Matthews. "No one wants to get kicked off trails... We all live in L.A. County; we all have to get along."

Matthews sentiments of a coexistence between hikers, cyclists and equestrians were echoed by many on both sides of the issue who agreed that a few people are ruining the experience for everyone else. 

"Whether the group you may associate yourself with makes contact with the trails in the preserve with hiking boots, running shoes, stroller wheels, bicycle tires or horse shoes, you are not a privileged class," said James Riley. "It is also important to recognize that there are those among each of these groups who unfortunately misuse the preserve... and no single group deserves condemnation because of the mis-acts of the ignorant, inconsiderate or unconcerned few of their members."

Sean Martin, a horse trainer in Rolling Hills Estates, attributed bad encounters between equestrians and cyclists to a lack of education on trail etiquette.

"Horse groups and bicyclists need to come together as one," Martin said. "For me, education all around makes multiuse trails work ... I do agree with multiuse if everyone in this room gets educated on how to be safe on the trails with each other."

The approval of the plan did come with a few stipulations including the placement of signs that will ask bikers to walk their bikes on dangerous parts of certain trails at the request of Councilman Jim Knight.

In addition, the council voted to turn down city staff's recommendation to open the Landslide Scarp Trail and eastern branch of the Ishibashi Farm Trail to mountain bikers based on line of sight and safety concerns.

The city council said its biggest issue with passing the new plan was how rules in the preserve will be enforced.

Councilman Jerry Duhovic called for system where cyclists would only be allowed on the trails on odd days of the month to keep them separated from hikers and equestrians.

"The biggest problem I have, I think, is (hikers and equestrians) no longer go to the trails because they don't feel safe," said Duhovic. "I think in some way, shape or form, there needs some separation."

Councilwoman Susan Brooks proposed a three-strikes plan that would ban users from the preserve after three infractions but other council members challenged how that plan could be enforced.

In the end, the city council made an additional motion to direct city staff to prepare recommendations in the next 90 days for enforcing trail use rules on the nature preserve.

"I don't think it matters what we decide tonight if we don't have enforcement," said Mayor Pro Tem Brian Campbell. "It is just happy talk if we don't have some type of real enforcement combined with an educational program to make it stick." 

New Trail Use Designations:

Filiorum Reserve (Previously Undesignated):

  • 6 trails encompassing 3.1 miles designated multiuse (pedestrian, equestrian, bicycle).
  • 2 trails encompassing 0.5 miles designated pedestrian and equestrian only.

Abalone Cove Reserve

  • Via de Campo Trail: Changed from pedestrian only to pedestrian/bicycle.
  • Chapel View Trail: Changed from pedestrian/equestrian to multiuse.
  • Beach School Trail: Changed from pedestrian to pedestrian/bicycle.
  • Harden Trail: Trail closed completely due to erosion.
  • Portuguese Point Loop Trail: Changed from pedestrian only to pedestrian/bicycle.

Three Sisters Reserve

  • Trail plan changed to include multiuse connector trail between the Three Sisters and Filiorum Reserve.

Portuguese Bend Reserve

  • Burma Road Overlook: New multiuse trail added to lead to an overlook.
  • Pine Grove Trail: Trail to be closed due to a fire that burned the pine grove.
  • Landslide Scarp Trail: Will remain pedestrian/equestrian only.
  • Ishibashi Farm Trail: Eastern branch will remain pedestrian/equestrian only.

Ocean Trails Reserve

  • Sagebrush Walk Trail: Changed from pedestrian only to pedestrian/bicycle.
Anna Penn October 03, 2012 at 02:52 PM
This is a disaster waiting to happen. Not a matter of "if", but 'when'. Wonder how many injuries and law suits it will take before they see their mistake.
Noel Park October 03, 2012 at 03:10 PM
Melody Colbert October 03, 2012 at 03:58 PM
I think Patch maybe overstated equestrians' response to council actions last night; primarily we wanted to keep Ishibashi and Landslide Scarp trails as eq/ped only, and the Council agreed to that. In addition, they designated another trail in Filiorum as eq/ped only when it was proposed as multi-use. Most of the other trails where cyclists are newly permitted, are not used by equestrians in general (west of PVDS). Also I question the use of the term "force" when describing the efficacy of signage requiring cyclists and equestrians to get off and walk their vehicles (yes horses are vehicles) at certain spots. The council recognized the need for greater enforcement and more importantly, the need for COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT in helping to curb unwanted/illicit activity in the preserve. More of us need to start volunteering.
Tony Baker October 03, 2012 at 05:04 PM
Tony Baker The next step should be to change the name from P.V.Nature Preserve to P.V. Mountain Bike Recreational X Fun Zone. A small minority of users have usurped most of the trails for their entertainment and bravado. It is impossible to enforce the rules. Volunteers patrolling? Bikers cutting through habitat or using trails that exclude bikes are not going to freeze in place for an hour for the ranger to be summoned. And what about the people with headlamps riding at night? Vandalism of signs will continue, new spur trails will be formed through habitat, erosion will continue, fewer equestions and hikers will use the single lane multi use trails while the number of bikes will increase. The majority of us have lost the ability go for a quiet hike/horseback ride to enjoy a quiet connection with nature on most of the trails. And I sure would not want to be a lizard or snake trying to live in the "preserve".
robin October 03, 2012 at 05:30 PM
I would like to say.... CIty Council folk turn a blind eye when it comes to horses and what little is left to this hill. The overcrowding is ever so noticiable. especially this year. Bikers are NOT cordial.. When it comes to large groups of them, it is a dangerous situation. Example, 100's of them riding together hogging the roads and not moving out of the way for motorized vehicles. Just visualize this many on the trails cruising along with horses and pedestrians. It will take an injury and or even death before city council will eliminate bikers on trails. 10 years - nothing will be left of the peninsula, no open space, no horses, no trees, way over crowded. It will blend in with the rest of Los Angeles. It's a shame too. If horses still exist, we will have to ride on the asphault along with the cars. Heck, why not??? City council - drive the hill all day long, rather than sit in your cozy office all day. Take a look and see what you guys are destroying and taking away.
Ian Bisco October 03, 2012 at 05:36 PM
Very disappointed the council did not approve extra trails in Portuguese Bend for cyclists namely Lanslide Scarp and Ishibashi. Landslide especially completes a loop back up to the Burma Rd. Yes it's narrow in places and necessitates carefully maneuvering around bushes but this also makes it slow. Ishibashi I would have also thought was tricky for horses due to a moving drop off across the trail due to the land movement. We did not hear concerns for equestrian concerns falling off at this point! The tone of the meeting was Equestrians versus bike riders, I feel both were missing the big picture, the more publicity this area gets and the more time passes we are going to get inundated with more and more traffic. Riding my bicycle out there I am already seeing this and more are what I call city slickers unaware of our concerns for preservation. Yes disappointed!
Noel Park October 03, 2012 at 06:01 PM
I agree with Tony. I'm outta there. Maybe the bikers will contribute the money the Land Conservancy need to restore and maintain the "preserve".
Tim Vaughan October 04, 2012 at 01:57 AM
I am having trouble finding the trails that are marked for bicycles only. There seem to be a lot of pedestrian and horse dedicated trails. Why not give the bicycles a trail that they can ride with just other bicycles. I must also say that with all the signs and enforcement on the trails, the preserve has lost the serenity that I used to go there for on a quiet ride on my bicycle. Try riding on the roads around PV and you get cars trying to run you over going by at 50 mph. Robin, you talk about a dangerous situation, try going for a little scenic ride around the hill in the bike lane sometime. Cars are NOT cordial, even when it's just my wife and I.
Troy October 04, 2012 at 04:36 AM
This is an emotional issue so it's just human nature to miss some facts. There are over 50 miles of trails without bikes Rolling Hills, Rolling Hills Estates, and Palos Verdes Estates. In Portuguese Bend 48% of the trails are bike free. I've used the trails for over 30 years and agree that things have changed. The creation of the reserve has greatly increased the number of people in the Portuguese Bend Reserve. Comparing the 2007 conservancy user survey with the one done in 2012, the number of visitors has increased from 243 to 519 on the survey day. However, the number of cyclists dropped from 59 to 39, hardly an increase. The number of equestrians increased dramatically from 4 to 32, a huge increase. It's pretty obvious that pedestrian use has increased substantially. I could conclude that equestrian use has also increased. However, I know that equestrians made a special showing that day to increase numbers. While I agree that overcrowding is a concern, "nothing will be left of the peninsula, no open space, no horses, and no trees" is a quite a stretch. I agree with Melody, it wasn't a huge change for equestrians, and we need to help enforcement by volunteering. I know some may be upset but we do have a compromise here. We need to move forward and try a little cooperation. Our goals are not that different.
Lewis Latimer October 04, 2012 at 04:15 PM
Wow. What amazes me is that people are arguing about an area that was free from management for decades upon decades! Somehow we all seemed to get along without incident. But don't worry folks! I just read where there is now going to be a call in number to report misuse of the Preserve; this to go along with all of the prohibitive signage, restricted areas, police officers on ATV's, etc. So I was thinking, why not consider camera surveillance. Hmmmm? That way we can catch a bicyclist or a horse on the wrong trail or maybe some kids building a fort to play in or building a bicycle jump for their BMX's or maybe some teenager smoking some pot. Shoot, I betcha if we really, really patrol the area diligently we can find some kid out there shooting rabbits with his b.b. gun! You want to know what is really amazing? What is really amazing is that this "Nature Preserve" could survive all those years without oversight and management. Yep, a real slice of heaven up there since you guys took over.
Michael E. October 07, 2012 at 03:24 PM
Too bad--this decision really is a game-changer. Bicyclists will definitely make it a degraded nature experience. We used to have rules of engagement years ago on the ski slopes. You would make known your presence as you approached another skier from behind by announcing, 'on your left', or, 'on your right'. Then snowboarders entered the picture, and everything changed for the worse. It took years, but they eventually got their own 'parks' within the resorts. I've walked across the Golden Gate Bridge and was appalled and angered by inconsiderate cyclists racing at 30-40 MPH through tight confines, with crowds of elderly tourists, amateur photographers, and families with toddlers; all looked upon by these knuckleheads as 'tire-fodder'. No warnings and no slow-downs. They have even had fatalities in the city up north, where in congested pedestrian areas, people have been struck and killed by unthinking and arrogant cyclists. This is a very bad idea on several levels.....
Michael E. October 07, 2012 at 03:38 PM
Welcome to the world as we know it--larger population, MORE demand on MORE limited resources ALWAYS creates a need for MORE regulation. What you end up with is controlled chaos, with people ready to react in a moment of pent-up angst, just like rats in a cage......


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »